I’ve never had to think too much about divorce. Unlike most Westerners, I’ve never really had to face the issue. My parents, along with all the aunts and uncles I grew up with, as well as all my friends’ parents, are all still together. Not all of them are in happy relationships, but they’re all still living in the same house, at least. I do have aunts and uncles who are “separated,” but they all live in different states and provinces and they’ve never been a part of my life, really.

Fortunately, I’m in a good marriage myself, and all my married friends seem to be doing well, too. So it’s not an issue I come across very often.

See, Mennonites don’t divorce. The Old Colony Church where I grew up has no formal procedures for carrying out divorce (as far as I know), and remarriage is absolutely out of the question under any and all circumstances. If a husband and wife just can’t get along they might start living separately, but that also means they can’t really be a part of the Mennonite community any more. To divorce means to cut yourself off from all community.

I grew up understanding that if you got divorced it meant you weren’t a strong Christian, or perhaps not even a Christian at all. The primary way you expressed your spirituality was through family life – by getting married, having kids, and staying married. If you got divorced it was because you were selfish, uncommitted, and didn’t love Jesus. You couldn’t serve Jesus and be divorced at the same time. And if you remarried, you were almost certainly going to hell. There was obviously no hope for a sinner like you.

So with my complete lack of experience in regards to divorce, I have to admit that I don’t really know anything about it. I have to confess that I don’t really understand what Jesus is saying when he talks about divorce in the book of Matthew (19: 8-9). I don’t know if there are exceptions to the general no-divorce rule in the Bible, and if so, what they are. I don’t know who should be in charge of enforcing those rules, if anyone. I’m not sure what role the church or the government should play in terms of what they should allow or enable.

And on a blog about marriage, I feel like I ought to have something to say about divorce. So here are the things that I do know:

I do know that divorce is tragic and contrary to God’s design for human life, and that in an ideal world it would never happen. I know that God meant for us to remain united – sexually, emotionally, and proximally – with one person for the extent of our lives. But I also know that we live in a fallen world and things don’t always work out that way. But I’m not sure why.

I know that to a large degree, divorce is so prevalent in our society because people are indeed selfish and uncommitted.

I also know that entering marriage with the mindset, “If this doesn’t work out, we’ll just get a divorce and try again” spells doom. Every couple should enter into a marriage expecting to make it work no matter what.

But selfishness and lack of commitment and a poor mindset certainly can’t explain every marriage breakdown. I’m certain that some very good people go through divorce, and it has nothing to do with how “Christian” they are. I’m certain that some very generous, committed, God-loving individuals go through divorce and I have no idea why. I certainly can’t be the judge, in any particular instance, of whether the couple did something wrong. I simply cannot point to any one couple and say with certainty, “You could have stayed together if you had tried harder.” I have no idea, really.

I also know that regardless, compassion for those who have gone through divorce is absolutely essential. I don’t know what the rules are for the people who are breaking up, but I know that my responsibility as a witness and a Christ-follower is to be sympathetic, generous, and non-judgmental. What do I really know about anything?

My other responsibility is to listen. Maybe if I listen carefully enough, I will learn more about the topic of divorce from those who have gone through it. I need to befriend people – single, married, divorced – and hear their stories with generosity and open-mindedness.

And where I can, I also want to help keep married people together. I want to encourage them to keep going, and help them through times of need, and offer my own stories so they can see marriage through another set of eyes.

What do you think? Am I missing anything? What other responsibilities might I have? How else might I learn more about divorce? If you have been divorced yourself, what else do you think I should know?

Photo courtesy of David Kingham.

{ 15 comments }

Objection #4 to Early Marriage: Marrying for Sex

by Kathleen Quiring on March 6, 2010

For the last few weeks I have been defending early marriage. Part of my argument for why we ought to consider marrying younger had to do with saving sex for marriage: I believe that sex should stay within marriage, but that it’s unreasonable to expect people to wait until their late twenties — the age at which North Americans generally get hitched — to have sex. Thus, people should consider getting married younger.

The natural — and perfectly reasonable — objection that many readers have to this idea is that it will encourage young people to rush unprepared into marriage just so they can enjoy guilt-free sex.

early marriageObviously, this is a legitimate concern. I absolutely agree that sex alone is a terrible reason to get married. I am certain that countless couples have found themselves in bad marriages just because they wanted sex and thought marriage was the only way to get it. So I don’t want anyone to think that marriage alone solves the sex problem, and I would never counsel a young couple to make their vows just so they can finally get into bed together.

Indeed, couples should never rush into marriage, for any reason. They should take very serious time to think about the decision to make life vows. They should be certain that they are ready to stake their lives on this relationship and that the other person is, too.

But I do have one thing to say:

Our sex drive does have some merit, and we should listen to what it has to say.

I believe that sex was all God’s idea and he just loves it. He thinks sex is the bomb. He loves seeing committed couples copulate (whew! — alliteration) and he gave us sex drives for a reason.

I think God invented the human sex drive in part to encourage us to get married.

Sex drive is powerful for a reason, I think. God wanted us to feel — in a very powerful way — the weighty significance of sexual relationships. He probably knew that we would need some nudging in the direction of marriage. We might be more reluctant to ever get hitched — to make that enormous, sacrificial commitment — without a little prodding from our eager nether-regions.

And our sex drives tell us something important: that we’re designed for sex and making babies! And we’re designed to do it when we’re young. When we’re healthy, virile, energetic and . . . elastic. Metaphorically and literally speaking.

I’m not saying that we can’t have babies when we’re older. Lots of fabulous families start (or keep growing) when the parents are in their thirties or even forties. But for the most part, it’s clear that our bodies were meant for early childbearing. There’s a reason that we’re most fertile (and interested in sex) in our early adulthood. That’s when we’re supposed to produce offspring!

God made our bodies this way. Or, if you don’t believe in God, you could say that Nature made us this way. Why should we fight it? Why should we wait until our late twenties to get married and our thirties to have children? (I have responded to some of the oft-cited reasons already)

Our society has all kinds of horrible ways of talking about our primordial interest in sex. They use words like “horny” and “randy.” They wrinkle their noses and ask questions like, “Should a couple really get married just to satisfy their randiness?” To me, this is an ugly way of asking, “Is our sex drive really a legitimate indicator that we ought to enter into a committed relationship?” And my answer to that question is “Yes! . . . At least, that’s part of it.”

Sex alone is not a good enough reason to get married. Of course. But a desire for sex with a particular person, when coupled with a desire for lifelong intimacy with that person, and a willingness to sacrifice everything to that person is a good reason to get married.

Of course, we have to be careful, when considering marriage, to be sure that our sex drive is not fooling us into thinking we are ready for the whole package deal when we’re not. Sex can play tricks on our minds if we’re not careful. Or it can blow past all logical thinking completely and get us to do all kinds of things we regret later if we don’t treat it with enormous caution. We have to be thoughtful and honest and make sure that sex is not the only — or even prime — motivator for getting married. And this is going to be extremely difficult to discern.

But desire for sex is not a completely meaningless component, either. I don’t think we should treat our sex drive as entirely irrelevant. It says something important, as long as we don’t allow it to drown out everything else in the mean time.

So if you’re dying to have sex with your beloved, and you truly feel that you could sacrifice everything for him or her, and that he or she would be willing to do the same for you; and if you think your partner would make a good parent and a good, lifelong friend to you . . . what’s stopping you? Why not consider marriage?

How do you feel about this? Do you think I esteem sex too highly? Do you think there are dangers to this way of thinking? Or is it important? What do you think?

Photo courtesy of Suzanne Clayton.

{ 10 comments }

Compatibility, Chemistry and Marriage: What Do you Think?

March 4, 2010

After I my last post, in which I responded to the common objection that early marriage means a higher likelihood of a poor match, some very interesting discussion arose in the comments regarding compatibility, chemistry, and commitment.
In my post, I basically argued that while compatibility (which I interchangeably referred to as “chemistry”) is nice in [...]

11 comments Read the full article →

Objection #3 to Early Marriage: A Poor Match

March 2, 2010

(This is a continuation of my Defense of Early Marriage series. I’m responding to common objections).
“But what if you find out he snores? Or sleepwalks?”
These were the objections a classmate of mine had when he found out that I was engaged after just two years of knowing and dating Ben. He couldn’t believe I was [...]

30 comments Read the full article →

Winter Wonderland Adventure

February 27, 2010

Update: Right after I posted that last post about not being that awesome, Ben invited me to join him on a winter wonderland adventure. We put on tons of layers and then trekked through the snow behind out property’s treeline, following woodchuck footprints to find their burrows. We followed them along the old railway, identifying [...]

4 comments Read the full article →

Our Marriage isn’t that Awesome

February 27, 2010

I’m worried.
I’m worried that with all this “Defense of Early Marriage” stuff, I’ve fallen into the “you-should-be-more-like-us-because-we’re-awesome” pattern of writing. I’ve included pictures of us doing rad stuff and talked about how great all of our friends are doing, and I worry that I’m getting show-offy.
I hate those books and blogs that are all about [...]

15 comments Read the full article →

Objection #2 to Early Marriage: Immaturity

February 24, 2010

I’m continuing my defense of early marriage by tackling objection #2: immaturity.
A lot of people believe that anyone under 25 will be too immature to make such a profound and lasting commitment as marriage, and will be psychologically unprepared for the responsibilities of being married.
Of course this is true for many young people. Lots of [...]

14 comments Read the full article →

Objection #1 to Early Marriage: Economic Insecurity

February 22, 2010

If you missed it, I recently wrote my Defense of Early Marriage. I listed the five main objections that people commonly have against early marriage, with the intention of responding to each of these objections.
The first objection I want to respond to is that of economic insecurity. Naysayers often point out that young people are [...]

15 comments Read the full article →

In Defense of Early Marriage

February 18, 2010

I have been wanting to write this post for a while. But I only got the clarity of vision and incentive to really tackle it when I came across Mark Regnerus’s fantastic article The Case for Early Marriage a few weeks ago (via Halfway to Normal). Suddenly, I was going, “Yes, yes! That’s exactly what [...]

28 comments Read the full article →

Just for Fun: How to Make Snow Ice Cream

February 16, 2010

I have fond memories of making snow ice cream with the family as a kid. I’m pretty sure it’s a Mennonite thing, although Ben has no recollections of making it growing up. Anyways, it’s the bomb. (I’m trying to bring back that late-90’s expression of approval but haven’t gotten a wide following yet). I loved [...]

7 comments Read the full article →
</